AIStackRankProduct record
All tools

Product record / 05

tl;dv AI meeting assistant

tl;dv helps revenue and customer teams turn recorded calls into clips, coaching insights, and patterns across multiple meetings. Its strongest use case is analyzing conversations rather than simply producing a transcript.

Revenue teamsFree planSalesGDPR
Starting price$29/mo
Free planAvailable
RecordingUnlimited
Last automated source checkNov 2, 2026

Buying decision

Evaluate what a manager can learn across calls

tl;dv is a candidate when recordings feed coaching and team learning. Start with a concrete review task: find a repeated objection, select a useful moment, and share it with someone who was not on the call. This is a different buying problem from simply removing a rep's note-taking work.

When to consider another approach

If nobody will review or share calls, a broader coaching workflow may be unnecessary. Compare Fathom for individual follow-up and Grain for a clip-centered workflow.

What to check in your evaluation

  • Verify which plan includes the reports and coaching workflow you will use.
  • Test clip sharing and the recipient's access requirements.
  • Check how CRM updates are reviewed before they become customer records.

Editorial guidance based on the linked product records and comparisons. This is not a hands-on test report.

01 / Pricing and usage

tl;dv pricing paths.

These rows normalize the ways a buyer can access tl;dv. The vendor page remains the authority for billing cycles, regional prices, promotions, and contract terms.

tl;dv pricing paths and usage limits
Plan pathPriceBillingUsage
Free$0Ongoing free tierFree-plan limits have not been separately verified; consult the official plan details.
Pro and Business$29/moPublished monthly starting pointUnlimited; advanced features and allowances vary by plan
EnterpriseSee vendorPlan or custom quoteAdministration, security, support, and usage terms vary by agreement

Check current tl;dv pricing on the official site →

  • Published recording or usage allowance: Unlimited
  • An ongoing free tier is available, with lower limits than paid plans.
  • Feature access, fair-use rules, and imported-file limits can differ by plan.

02 / Workflow coverage

How tl;dv fits into meetings.

Capture method matters as much as output. A visible meeting bot, native platform feature, browser extension, and local recorder each create a different participant and administration experience.

Capture method

Meeting bot with automatic calendar joining

Meeting platforms

Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams

Languages

Multilingual transcription with a vendor-maintained language list

Exports

Transcript, Recording, Clips, AI reports, CRM records

Key integrations

HubSpot · Salesforce · Slack · Notion · Zapier

03 / Data handling

Storage, retention, and controls.

Public pricing pages rarely provide a complete data-processing policy. Treat this section as a procurement starting point and verify contract language before sending sensitive or regulated conversations.

Storage policy

Cloud recordings and transcripts organized by workspace.

Retention policy

Retention and deletion options vary by plan and data-processing agreement.

Published controls

GDPR. Availability can depend on the selected plan or enterprise agreement.

04 / Capabilities

What stands out in tl;dv.

tl;dv is currently indexed for revenue teams. Its record emphasizes observable product capabilities rather than a universal score.

01

Multi-meeting insights

Included in the current tl;dv product record and checked against the official product or pricing source.

02

Sales coaching

Included in the current tl;dv product record and checked against the official product or pricing source.

03

Shareable clips

Included in the current tl;dv product record and checked against the official product or pricing source.

Compare the shortlist

tl;dv and three alternatives.

These are editorial comparison candidates, not a traffic or commission ranking. Prices are recorded entry points; open each record for billing terms and source dates.

Capture, cost, and workflow fit
ToolPaid entryFree planCapture methodPlatformsBest fit
tl;dv →$29/moAvailable; limits varyMeeting bot with automatic calendar joiningZoom, Google Meet, Microsoft TeamsRevenue teams
Grain →$15/moAvailable; limits varyMeeting bot, calendar auto-join, and recording captureZoom, Google Meet, Microsoft TeamsCustomer teams
Avoma →$19/moNot listedMeeting bot plus calendar, dialer, and recording integrationsZoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, Supported dialersRevenue operations
Fathom →$19/moAvailable; limits varyMeeting bot that joins supported video callsZoom, Google Meet, Microsoft TeamsSales teams

05 / Field-level evidence

Sources behind this record.

Each source names the fields it supports. Last automated source fetch: Nov 2, 2026; monitor status: no change detected. An automated fetch does not verify that every published price is still accurate. A detected change enters review before it alters a published fact.

tl;dv pricing and plan detailsPricing tiers · Usage limits · Free plan · Recording allowance · Editorial review date not recordedtl;dv product documentationCapture method · Platforms · Languages · Exports · Integrations · Data handling · Editorial review date not recordedReview methodologyNormalization, freshness, and corrections

Compare tl;dv

Detailed matchups.

Fathom vs tl;dvFathom suits a team trying to remove routine administration from every sales call. tl;dv justifies the extra layer when managers need to compare conversations, coach reps, and circulate short call moments across the organization.tl;dv vs Graintl;dv is a stronger match for sales managers focused on coaching and multi-call review. Grain is a practical choice for customer teams that want searchable calls, shareable moments, and structured meeting data flowing into a broader AI stack.tl;dv vs Gongtl;dv covers call coaching and multi-meeting review without turning the purchase into an enterprise project. Gong is the appropriate step up when conversation data must shape deal inspection and the organization is prepared for vendor-led pricing and implementation.tl;dv vs Claaptl;dv is easier to evaluate and better suited to managers who mainly need clips and multi-call coaching. Claap asks for a more sales-specific commitment but repays it when scoring and structured CRM enrichment are central to the enablement program.tl;dv vs MeetRecordtl;dv works for teams that want useful coaching without giving up a self-serve buying path. MeetRecord belongs on the shortlist when enablement leaders need systematic scoring, deal inspection, and practice workflows and are comfortable with quote-based procurement.tl;dv vs Read AISales and customer leaders who coach from recorded examples will get a more directed workflow from tl;dv. Read AI is broader and less expensive at the published entry point, especially for organizations that want engagement signals and meeting analytics outside a strictly revenue-focused context.tl;dv vs Avomatl;dv is a focused choice for teams that already like their sales stack and mainly want better call review. Avoma is easier to justify when revenue operations wants to replace several disconnected steps around customer meetings, from booking through follow-up and manager analysis.tl;dv vs Circlebacktl;dv is the clearer fit when better calls are the goal and managers will regularly review the material. Circleback is the stronger operations tool for consultants, agencies, and account teams that already know how to run meetings but lose time carrying each outcome into other systems.

Alternatives

Other tools for a similar job.

Fathom logo
FathomSales teams · $19/mo
Fireflies.ai logo
Fireflies.aiTeam knowledge · $18/mo
Granola logo
GranolaFounders · $14/mo
Otter.ai logo
Otter.aiRecruiting · $16.99/mo
Comparison librarySee every detailed matchup.Data maintenanceCheck recent source reviews.About the indexUnderstand who this research serves.