AIStackRankProduct record
All tools

Product record / 06

Avoma AI meeting assistant

Avoma combines scheduling, meeting notes, follow-up automation, and revenue intelligence in one workflow. It is best suited to sales and customer-facing organizations that want meeting data tied closely to CRM activity.

Revenue operationsSalesSOC 2, HIPAA options
Starting price$19/mo
Free planNot listed
RecordingUnlimited
Last automated source checkNov 2, 2026

Buying decision

Map scheduling, capture, and follow-up before pricing the rollout

Avoma is a candidate for revenue operations teams evaluating several stages of the meeting workflow together. Map who schedules, who records, who reviews, and who consumes CRM updates. Then ask for the cost of that complete setup, including any separate intelligence or administration features.

When to consider another approach

If scheduling and coaching are already covered, compare a narrower assistant such as Fathom. Include Gong when the evaluation is about a wider revenue intelligence deployment.

What to check in your evaluation

  • Request a written breakdown of modules, seats, and implementation costs.
  • Verify the exact calendar, dialer, and CRM combination you plan to use.
  • For regulated use, obtain the applicable agreement and configuration requirements; a security badge alone does not establish suitability.

Editorial guidance based on the linked product records and comparisons. This is not a hands-on test report.

01 / Pricing and usage

Avoma pricing paths.

These rows normalize the ways a buyer can access Avoma. The vendor page remains the authority for billing cycles, regional prices, promotions, and contract terms.

Avoma pricing paths and usage limits
Plan pathPriceBillingUsage
Meeting Assistant and Conversation Intelligence$19/moPublished monthly starting pointUnlimited; advanced features and allowances vary by plan
EnterpriseSee vendorPlan or custom quoteAdministration, security, support, and usage terms vary by agreement

Check current Avoma pricing on the official site →

  • Published recording or usage allowance: Unlimited
  • No ongoing free tier is currently recorded.
  • Feature access, fair-use rules, and imported-file limits can differ by plan.

02 / Workflow coverage

How Avoma fits into meetings.

Capture method matters as much as output. A visible meeting bot, native platform feature, browser extension, and local recorder each create a different participant and administration experience.

Capture method

Meeting bot plus calendar, dialer, and recording integrations

Meeting platforms

Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, Supported dialers

Languages

Multilingual transcription; verify supported languages for each workflow

Exports

Transcript, AI notes, Clips, CRM fields, Coaching insights

Key integrations

HubSpot · Salesforce · Slack · Dialers · Calendars

03 / Data handling

Storage, retention, and controls.

Public pricing pages rarely provide a complete data-processing policy. Treat this section as a procurement starting point and verify contract language before sending sensitive or regulated conversations.

Storage policy

Cloud conversation library with role and workspace controls.

Retention policy

Contract and workspace policy determine retention; public pricing does not state one universal period.

Published controls

SOC 2, HIPAA options. Availability can depend on the selected plan or enterprise agreement.

04 / Capabilities

What stands out in Avoma.

Avoma is currently indexed for revenue operations. Its record emphasizes observable product capabilities rather than a universal score.

01

AI follow-ups

Included in the current Avoma product record and checked against the official product or pricing source.

02

CRM field sync

Included in the current Avoma product record and checked against the official product or pricing source.

03

Conversation intelligence add-ons

Included in the current Avoma product record and checked against the official product or pricing source.

Compare the shortlist

Avoma and three alternatives.

These are editorial comparison candidates, not a traffic or commission ranking. Prices are recorded entry points; open each record for billing terms and source dates.

Capture, cost, and workflow fit
ToolPaid entryFree planCapture methodPlatformsBest fit
Avoma →$19/moNot listedMeeting bot plus calendar, dialer, and recording integrationsZoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, Supported dialersRevenue operations
Gong →Contact salesNot listedCalendar, conferencing, telephony, and revenue-system captureZoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, Supported dialersEnterprise sales
tl;dv →$29/moAvailable; limits varyMeeting bot with automatic calendar joiningZoom, Google Meet, Microsoft TeamsRevenue teams
Fathom →$19/moAvailable; limits varyMeeting bot that joins supported video callsZoom, Google Meet, Microsoft TeamsSales teams

05 / Field-level evidence

Sources behind this record.

Each source names the fields it supports. Last automated source fetch: Nov 2, 2026; monitor status: change awaiting review. An automated fetch does not verify that every published price is still accurate. A detected change enters review before it alters a published fact.

Avoma pricing and plan detailsPricing tiers · Usage limits · Free plan · Recording allowance · Editorial review date not recordedAvoma product documentationCapture method · Platforms · Languages · Exports · Integrations · Data handling · Editorial review date not recordedReview methodologyNormalization, freshness, and corrections

Compare Avoma

Detailed matchups.

Fathom vs AvomaFathom makes sense when a team wants dependable notes without changing the rest of its sales stack. Avoma is the better candidate when revenue operations wants one system to coordinate scheduling, notes, follow-up, and deeper call analysis.Avoma vs GongAvoma is the more approachable all-in-one choice for growing sales and customer teams. Gong is the stronger candidate for larger organizations that already have mature revenue operations and want deeper deal inspection rather than a general meeting assistant.Avoma vs MeetRecordAvoma is the better fit when reps need one tool before, during, and after meetings. MeetRecord is more suitable when enablement leaders already have the basic meeting workflow covered and want systematic call scoring and sales coaching.Laxis vs AvomaLaxis is an appealing lower-cost choice for a small sales team that wants prospect context and notes in one assistant. Avoma is better suited to a growing revenue organization that needs scheduling, structured CRM work, and room to add deeper call analysis.Avoma vs ClaapAvoma is the more complete operating layer for a revenue team that wants one product around every meeting. Claap is the sharper tool for an organization that already has scheduling and basic notes covered but needs coaching and CRM enrichment to become more systematic.Avoma vs CirclebackRevenue operations teams should favor Avoma when scheduling and structured CRM work need one owner. Circleback is more adaptable for agencies, consultants, and client-service groups whose follow-up touches many systems and whose meetings do not all belong to a conventional sales pipeline.tl;dv vs Avomatl;dv is a focused choice for teams that already like their sales stack and mainly want better call review. Avoma is easier to justify when revenue operations wants to replace several disconnected steps around customer meetings, from booking through follow-up and manager analysis.

Alternatives

Other tools for a similar job.

Fathom logo
FathomSales teams · $19/mo
tl;dv logo
tl;dvRevenue teams · $29/mo
Read AI logo
Read AIMeeting analytics · $15/mo
Bluedot logo
BluedotSensitive meetings · $14/mo
Comparison librarySee every detailed matchup.Data maintenanceCheck recent source reviews.About the indexUnderstand who this research serves.